By Gert Webelhuth, Manfred Sailer, Heike Walker
This booklet represents the cutting-edge on rightward circulate in a single thematically coherent quantity. It records the starting to be significance of the combo of empirical and theoretical paintings in linguistic research. a number of contributions argue that rightward stream is a way of decreasing phonological or structural complexity. The inclusion of corpus info and psycholinguistic effects confirms definitely the right Roof Constraint as a attribute estate of extraposition and argues for a discounted function of subsentential bounding nodes. The contributions additionally exhibit that the phenomenon can't be checked out from one module of grammar by myself, yet demands an interplay of syntax, semantics, phonology, and discourse. The dialogue of alternative languages comparable to English, German, Dutch, Italian, Italian signal Language, smooth Greek, Uyghur, and Khalkha complements our realizing of the complexity of the phenomenon. ultimately, the analytic ideas of other frameworks are explored. the amount is of curiosity to scholars and researchers of syntax, semantics, psycholinguistics, and corpus linguistics.
Read Online or Download Rightward Movement in a Comparative Perspective PDF
Similar grammar books
Studying approximately Language is an exhilarating and impressive sequence of introductions to basic issues in language, linguistics and comparable components. The books are designed for college kids of linguistics and people who are learning language as a part of a much wider direction. Cognitive Linguistics explores the concept that language displays our event of the realm.
Point 2 - Cambridge English: MoversThe lecturers publication at each point contains the reply key, photocopiable assessments and audio transcripts.
- The Grammar Schools of Medieval England: A. F. Leach in Historiographical Perspective
- Studies in Greek Syntax
- Collins Good Grammar
- Beja Pedagogical Grammar
Extra info for Rightward Movement in a Comparative Perspective
Take the contrast between Culicover and Rochemont’s examples (43) and (44). In (44), the relative clause occurs in situ and a Principle C effect is correctly predicted, as the first object c-commands the second object and the relative clause is contained in the latter. But these very structural relations also obtain in (43), according to the coordination + ellipsis theory: the only difference is that in the right conjunct the associate has been phonologically deleted, which should not have any influence on binding theory!
The argument of course depends on the adoption of the Uniform Thematic Alignment Hypothesis of Baker (1988). We assume that Wilder would not be willing to give up this assumption, whose essential content has been a leading idea since the beginnings of transformational grammar in one form or another. Rightward Movement in a Comparative Perspective moved to the right in overt syntax, but that at LF it is interpreted as a complement of the DP it has moved away from. This interpretative relationship presupposes that the associate DP govern the relative clause.
Merger of who in argument position) Step 2: can you recommend whok to me [who]k. (QR of who to the right) Step 3: can you recommend whok to me [[who]k [RC who speaks good French]] (late merge of the relative clause) But now what? (79) begins with a spelled-out who and the question is where this who comes from. Assume that it is the original who that was merged into the object position of recommend in Step 1. Then it must be assumed that this same element has undergone two movement operations, one covert rightward movement in Step 2 and an additional overt leftward movement step.
Rightward Movement in a Comparative Perspective by Gert Webelhuth, Manfred Sailer, Heike Walker