By Anthony Douglas Woozley
Read or Download Theory of Knowledge: An Introduction PDF
Best epistemology books
This booklet increases questions on the character of philosophy by means of interpreting the resource and value of 1 critical philosophical challenge: how do we recognize whatever concerning the international round us? Stroud discusses and criticizes the perspectives of such philosophers as Descartes, Kant, J. L. Austin, G. E. Moore, R.
Emily Grosholz deals an unique research of demonstration in arithmetic and technological know-how, analyzing the way it works and why it really is persuasive. targeting geometrical demonstration, she exhibits the jobs that illustration and ambiguity play in mathematical discovery. She offers a variety of case experiences in mechanics, topology, algebra, common sense, and chemistry, from old Greece to the current day, yet focusing rather at the 17th and 20th centuries.
First released in 1987. Routledge is an imprint of Taylor & Francis, an informa corporation.
The sensitivity precept is a compelling suggestion in epistemology and is usually characterised as an important for wisdom. This number of 13 new essays constitutes a state of the art dialogue of this crucial precept. a number of the essays construct on and develop sensitivity-based bills of information and provide novel defences of these money owed.
- Descartes on Seeing. Epistemology and Visual Perception
- Philosophy of the Economy: An Aristotelian Approach
- Unnatural Doubts
- The Construction of Social Reality
- Contrastive reasons
- The Philosophy of 'As if': A System of the Theoretical, Practical and Religious Fictions of Mankind
Extra resources for Theory of Knowledge: An Introduction
Certainly metaphorically and perhaps literally, the two visitors had been transported back a hundred years into the past. N o w the authenticity of this adventure does not concern us, although in fact Memory (continued) S7 the evidence has been most carefully and dispassionately collected, but what does interest us is that it purports to be an instance of some kind of acquaintance with the past which is not also an instance of memory.
The first certainly will not, as Hume himself points o u t : 1 cannot tell on internal evidence whether a string of images preserves the order of the original or not; simply by inspecting the images themselves I cannot tell whether the order has been changed or not. In order to discover that I should have to confront the images with the original and compare the order in each. e. having images) and that not all memory is of one sort (as it would not be if re-acquaintance with the past original were possible).
F o r instance, I might reasonably claim to remember that nowadays motor-cars travel at such a speed that pedestrians who have stepped in front of them have lived to regret it or have not lived at all. If I base my conduct on the supposition that that memory is correct, I shall probably live longer than if I do not. The success of familiarity 1. p. 41 above. 52 Theory of Knowledge memory, then, is some evidence, and strong evidence, that the memory is correct. N o w nobody, I think, would be so absurd as to deny the facts— that a life guided by past memories is less likely to be cut short by a motor-car than one not so guided—and I would not be thought to be denying them.
Theory of Knowledge: An Introduction by Anthony Douglas Woozley